Clinical Trial Radar · Use cases

Nine worlds. One evidence layer.

Clinical Trial Radar sits between authoritative public records and the people making high-stakes decisions. It plans the research, checks the live record, and shows which source each statement came from. Scroll through the worlds it serves.

Not an ungrounded chatbot.

Study searches run against the live registry, and answers carry inline citations.

Not another search box.

It explains what a record means, in plain language, in your language.

Not a lead funnel.

No account, no ads, no sale or sharing of contact data — and consent before any health answer.

01 — Patients & caregivers

Understand your options tonight.

1:04 a.m. A new diagnosis, a progression, a standard of care that has run out — and a registry written for researchers.

Trial Radar turns that search into something a family can follow: plain language, sources attached, nothing to sign up for.

  • Ask in your own words, or filter by condition, treatment, phase and recruiting status — then sort study sites by distance.
  • Read any study, term or eligibility criterion explained in plain language, with the original text one tap away.
  • Prepare with Eligibility Questions in the Participation Assistant, which starts only after you give explicit consent.
  • Save studies, compare up to five side by side, and print a clean packet for the appointment.
  • Share a conversation with family through a link that expires after 30 days unless you renew it, and get e-mail alerts when a study changes.

Trial Radar explains eligibility criteria in plain language and helps you prepare questions. It does not determine whether you qualify — only the study team can do that.

Criterion, explainedExample

Original wording

Adequate hepatic function, defined as total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN.

In plain language

A blood test measures bilirubin, a substance your liver helps clear. This study requires a result no more than 1.5 times the lab’s upper limit of normal.

Next · 02 Clinicians

02 — Clinicians

Four minutes to a defensible shortlist.

The patient asks about experimental options. The appointment has four minutes left.

Trial Radar does the reading first, then shows its work so you can check it.

  • Combine structured filters with natural-language search; study searches run against the live ClinicalTrials.gov API, not model memory.
  • Read criteria rewritten in plain language beside the original registry text.
  • In Advanced mode, turn the study's own criteria into a Clinician Checklist — a preparation aid, not an eligibility decision.
  • Open inline citations to the registry record, PubMed literature and FDA labels — with a plain statement that the sources shown are not exhaustive.
Answer, with sourcesKEYNOTE-189
An inline citation links a KEYNOTE-189 answer to its published source
Expanded References states that sources are not exhaustive and labels an FDA label excerpt
Next · 03 Coordinators

03 — Research coordinators & site teams

Conversations that start informed.

Protocol surprises tend to surface at the first visit — the travel, the procedures, the washout period.

When candidates can read a protocol's demands before they call, the first conversation can start further along. Trial Radar is designed for exactly that preparation.

  • Visit schedules, procedures and timelines explained in plain language.
  • Inclusion and exclusion criteria readable at home, with the registry text alongside.
  • Printed question lists that candidates bring to the call.
  • Site locations, contacts and maps taken from the registry record.

Trial Radar does not screen, refer or enroll candidates, and does not sell or share their contact details.

Questions for the study teamExample
  1. How many visits happen in the first month, and where?
  2. Would I need to stop a current medication, and for how long?
  3. Which procedures are part of the study, beyond my usual care?
  4. Are travel or parking costs covered?
Next · 04 Advocacy

04 — Advocacy organizations

A resource you can recommend with confidence.

Your members trust you with their hardest questions. Whatever you link to carries your name.

Trial Radar is built to deserve that trust, by design rather than by promise.

  • Free for patients, caregivers and clinicians, with no account.
  • No ads, and no sale or sharing of contact data.
  • Health answers processed only after explicit, revocable consent.
  • 13 languages, so one resource works across your whole community.
  • Co-branded, condition-focused hubs available through a partnership.
For your board's reviewSummary
  • Every core feature works without sign-up
  • Answers cite the registry, literature and FDA data
  • Consent before any health answer; End requests deletion
  • Keyboard, screen-reader and right-to-left support
Next · 05 Global

05 — Global & multilingual communities

In your language, by default.

ClinicalTrials.gov records are written in English. Most of the world's patients read another language first.

  • 13 languages across 16 locales, including full right-to-left Arabic and Hebrew.
  • Condition and treatment terms localized by real-world usage, not translated literally on the fly.
  • AI-assisted study-title translation in the reader's language.
  • Distance units, dates and typography that follow local conventions.
  • Studies in 220+ countries and all 50 U.S. states.
16 locales13 languages
العربيةDeutschEnglish · AUEnglish · GBEnglish · SGEnglish · USEspañolFrançaisעבריתहिन्दीItaliano日本語한국어NederlandsPortuguês · BR中文
Next · 06 Research

06 — Researchers, educators & health journalists

Every sentence, sourced.

A fluent paragraph about a trial is easy to produce. One you can cite is not.

  • Registry, literature and FDA label context assembled into one answer.
  • Literature ranking that weighs publication type — systematic reviews, guidelines, randomized trials.
  • Provenance labels that describe what source material was available — factual provenance, never a quality grade.
  • Save answers, share whole conversations or single answers, and print with citations intact.
Evidence provenanceTrial Radar
A PubMed reference is labeled Abstract, describes its evidence limits, and links to the registry record
Next · 07 Sponsors

07 — Biopharma sponsors & CROs

Make every study readable, everywhere.

Recruitment slips when people can't find a protocol — or can't read it in their language.

Trial Radar makes a sponsor's registered studies discoverable and understandable from day one, with no localization project on your side.

  • 1,000+ sponsor and organization portals, read live from the registry so they don't go stale.
  • AI organization overviews, with citations.
  • Portfolio analytics: phase mix, status and freshness, enrollment, geography and completion timelines.
  • Every registered study explainable in 13 languages.

Branded portals and partnership programs are available by arrangement. Trial Radar never sells or shares patient contact data.

Sponsor portalRegistry data
Studies
Enrolled
Sites

Phase mix

Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Recruiting, by countryMap
Record freshnessLast update
Completion timelineBy quarter
Next · 08 Investors

08 — Life-science investors & analysts

See the evidence behind the pipeline.

A status feed tells you something changed. It doesn't tell you what the design, the literature and the label say.

  • Read AI company overviews of marketed products and the late-stage pipeline, with citations to their sources.
  • Compare trial designs across a sponsor's portfolio and its competitors.
  • Read what the peer-reviewed literature reports, with citations.
  • Review FDA labels, approvals, recalls and adverse-event reports — FAERS data carries its causality caveats.
  • See market context on public-company profiles.

Research context, not investment advice.

Company overview · pipelineWith sources
ProgramPhaseNext milestone
Lead programFiledRegulatory decision 1
Second programPhase 3Topline data 2
Next indicationPhase 2Enrollment complete 3

Sources

Company announcements, registry records and peer-reviewed publications, each linked from its citation.

Next · 09 Trust

09 — Privacy, compliance & research-ethics reviewers

Consent you can audit.

Health AI is judged on consent, retention and deletion — not on which model it uses.

  • An explicit, revocable consent scope for each conversation and study; nothing health-related is processed before it.
  • Consented turns run only on Google Gemini — no cross-provider fallback, no tools.
  • An answer-free consent receipt, kept 62 days: proof that consent happened, with no answers or health information in it.
  • End revokes future use first, then requests deletion of the provider-side conversation; a scheduled worker enforces the retention windows.
  • Product analytics events are rebuilt from a field allowlist that has no place for AI prompts, AI answers or eligibility answers.
  • The Privacy Policy sets out the GDPR Article 9(2)(a) explicit-consent basis for this workflow.
Consent comes firstTrial Radar
Unchecked consent names Google Gemini, the retention window, and the option to end; Compare My Answers is disabled
Next · The thread through every world

The thread through every world

Complex evidence, cited and understood.

Clinical Trial Radar turns registry records, peer-reviewed literature and FDA data into accessible understanding — so people bring better questions to the professionals who make the decisions.

iOS & Android apps coming soon

Trial Radar explains eligibility criteria in plain language and helps you prepare questions. It does not determine whether you qualify — only the study team can do that.

Trial Radar is an information and education tool. It does not provide medical or investment advice, diagnose conditions, or enroll anyone in a study. AI responses can be inaccurate or incomplete; always check the original study record and talk with a qualified healthcare professional before making any medical or trial-participation decision.

Back to top